Home  |  Search help  |  Classification Scheme   |   Leslie Shepard   |   Zotero

The dancing master: vol. the first : or, directions for dancing country dances, with the tunes to each dance, for the treble-violin /

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: London : Printed by W. Pearson and sold by John Young, 1721.Edition: The 17th edition, containing 358 of the choicest old and new tunes now used at court, and other publick places. The whole work revised and done in the new-ty'd-note, and much more correct than any former editionDescription: 358 p. : ill., music ; 12 x 20 cmSubject(s): Summary: Originally published in 1651 under the title of The English dancing master, this work went through numerous editions from 1652 to 1728. Compiled by John Playford (1623-1687), a publisher of music books, the treatise is considered an important work on English country dances, a form of dance where couples perform a series of set patterns. The 17th edition is the first to be described as vol. the first, to distinguish it from two volumes of new dances, rather than signifying a splitting of the original. Information from Dean-Smith (1957)
Holdings
Item type Home library Shelving location Class number Materials specified Status Notes Date due Barcode
Books Books VWML Storage QS 35.4 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Reference only Presented to the library by Arthur Beak Heffer 2258
Books Books VWML Storage QS 35.4 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Reference only 2259
Offprints and Photocopies Offprints and Photocopies VWML QS 35.4 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 10496

Originally published in 1651 under the title of The English dancing master, this work went through numerous editions from 1652 to 1728. Compiled by John Playford (1623-1687), a publisher of music books, the treatise is considered an important work on English country dances, a form of dance where couples perform a series of set patterns. The 17th edition is the first to be described as vol. the first, to distinguish it from two volumes of new dances, rather than signifying a splitting of the original. Information from Dean-Smith (1957)

Share